Here at Applebrook Farm & Cider Mill, bees are kind of a big deal.
Without pollination, the crop is awfully light. No Macouns, no Baldwins, no Shizukas, no Cortlands, no Fujis, no Honeycrisps, no Cameos, no Gravensteins, no Summer Rambeaus, no Yellow Newtons, no Empires, no Braeburns, no SnowSweets, no Winesaps. Worst of all (in my expert opinion), no Jonagolds.
And for some customers, an autumn without Grampa Tony’s Apple Cider is a reason to consider suicide.
Anyway, Apis mellifera is our business partner. So a few days ago, when a member of the MSM admitted that in a 2013 “feature for Time magazine,” he fell for the hysteria about a “world without bees,” I was reminded of a column I wrote in the spring of 2015.
Enjoy!
■ ■ ■
The bees are dying, and it’s our fault.
That’s been ecochondriac organizations’ mantra for years, as they scaremonger — and raise millions — over colony collapse disorder (CCD).
Described by the U.S. Department of Agriculture as “sudden and widespread disappearances of adult honey bees from beehives,” CCD is real, and it is disturbing. Bees are vital to the agriculture industry, and as Americans increasingly embrace locally grown produce from small farms, pollination services will matter more than ever.
CCD must be combatted, broadly and aggressively. But peddlers of junk science, always on the prowl to profit from problems they can blame on technology, aren’t contributing to a rational and effective response.
Fortunately, Angela Logomasini is. Her “‘Beepocalypse’ Not: Alarmist Honeybee Claims Collapse Under Scrutiny,” published by the D.C.-based Competitive Enterprise Institute, offers a bracing shot of facts and data at CCD hysteria.
To counter the charge that CCD is a result of mankind’s “tampering with nature,” Logomasini notes that “honeybees are not even a ‘natural’ part of the ecosystem in the United States. They were imported from Europe during the 17th century for honey production and crop pollination, although some colonies now live in the wild. Like cattle, they are an agricultural commodity that is farmed and managed by human hands.” In the Western Hemisphere, the newcomers “generally do not survive as well,” in part due to “greater genetic variability that makes them more resistant to disease” in the Old World.
And not all hive wipeouts are due to CCD. America’s honeybees, Logomasini notes, “die and disappear for many reasons,” including parasites, stress from transportation, and inadequate nutrition. Varroa mites have “already nearly eliminated wild honeybee populations in the United States.” Trucking hives from state to state causes aggravation and spreads disease. Crop limitation might be making bees’ “nutritional sources … too one dimensional,” and the practice of supplementing diets with high-fructose corn syrup could prove unwise.
But why bother with complexity and nuance when a scapegoat can be found? Eco-loons have fingered a particular family of chemicals as the source of CCD. Neonicotinoids are defined by Texas A&M University as “a new class of insecticides … related to nicotine” that can “be applied to soil and be taken up by plants,” in order to reduce “the risks for insecticide drift from the target site.”
Neonicotinoids, Logomasini explains, are often applied to seeds “before planting, a practice that avoids broad environmental exposure.” Many of the studies that purport to prove a link between the insecticides are CCD were not conducted in the field, but in laboratories, where bees were subjected to unnaturally high exposures. Sometimes the “research” is simply irrelevant. The destruction detailed in a frequently cited Harvard study did “not constitute CCD. While some honeybees abandoned the hive, there were lots of dead bees present and some hives lost queens as well as their brood. This does not resemble CCD, which involves disappearance of nearly all worker bees with few dead bees present, with live queens and brood left behind.”
Another reason to be skeptical: If neonicotinoids impose a death sentence on honeybees, why is the carnage so limited in some regions? In “many places where these chemicals are used widely, such as in Australia, CCD is not a problem.” Canada is another country that uses neonicotinoids, but has experienced minimal hive destruction. And history is more than a little instructive. As Jon Entine of the Center for Health and Risk Communication observed in Forbes last year, “unpredictable bee deaths [have] occurred periodically for more than a century” — long before the era of neonicotinoids.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to No Dowd About It to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.